Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login
A

Autoconf VS GNU Make

Compare Autoconf VS GNU Make and see what are their differences

Bunny.net
BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Autoconf logo Autoconf

GNU Autoconf is a tool for producing configure scripts for building, installing and packaging...

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
  • Autoconf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Autoconf and GNU Make)

Autoconf

GNU Make

Front End Package Manager
17 17%
Front End Package Manager
83% 83
JavaScript Package Manager
21 21%
JavaScript Package Manager
79% 79
JS Build Tools
20 20%
JS Build Tools
80% 80
Continuous Integration
17 17%
Continuous Integration
83% 83

User comments

Share your experience with using Autoconf and GNU Make. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Autoconf and GNU Make, you can also consider the following products

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

Loading...