Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Apache Oozie VS Control-M

Compare Apache Oozie VS Control-M and see what are their differences

SysAid
Transform your IT service delivery with SysAid's seamless automation, ensuring a consistently exceptional experience for all users effortlessly featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache Oozie logo Apache Oozie

Apache Oozie Workflow Scheduler for Hadoop

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.
  • Apache Oozie Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-25
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12

Apache Oozie

Categories
  • IT Automation
  • Workflow Automation
  • Workload Automation
  • Product Deployment
Website oozie.apache.org
Edit details

Control-M

Categories
  • IT Automation
  • Workload Automation
  • Workflow Automation
  • Workflow Management
  • Data Automation
Website bmc.com
Edit details

Apache Oozie videos

+ Add

Migrating Apache Oozie Workflows to Apache Airflow

More videos:

  • Review - Breathing New Life into Apache Oozie with Apache Ambari Workflow Manager
  • Review - Breathing New Life into Apache Oozie with Apache Ambari Workflow Manager

Control-M videos

+ Add

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Oozie and Control-M)

Apache Oozie

Control-M

Workflow Automation
33 33%
Workflow Automation
67% 67
IT Automation
26 26%
IT Automation
74% 74
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
Monitoring Tools
100% 100
Product Deployment
33 33%
Product Deployment
67% 67

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Oozie and Control-M. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Oozie and Control-M

Apache Oozie Reviews

10 Best Airflow Alternatives for 2024
One of the workflow scheduler services/applications operating on the Hadoop cluster is Apache Oozie. It is used to handle Hadoop tasks such as Hive, Sqoop, SQL, MapReduce, and HDFS operations such as distcp. It is a system that manages the workflow of jobs that are reliant on each other. Users can design Directed Acyclic Graphs of processes here, which can be performed in...
Source: hevodata.com

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
Source: research.aimultiple.com
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
Source: www.softwaretestingmaterial.com
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Oozie seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Oozie mentions (1)

Control-M mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Control-M yet. Tracking of Control-M recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Oozie and Control-M, you can also consider the following products

ActiveBatch - Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Stonebranch - Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

JAMS Scheduler - Enterprise workload automation software supporting processes on Windows, Linux, UNIX, iSeries, SAP, Oracle, SQL, ERPs and more.

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

Loading...