Amazon ElastiCache VS Amazon Aurora

Amazon ElastiCache Reviews

Amazon Aurora Reviews

Amazon ElastiCache mentions (12)

• Choosing the Right AWS Database: A Guide for Modern Applications

  Key-value databases are designed to store and retrieve data using simple key-value pairs, making them ideal for applications that require fast and simple data access. AWS offers a fully managed key-value database service called Amazon ElastiCache that supports popular key-value engines such as Redis and Memcached. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• How to Effectively Use Caching to Improve Microservices Performance

  Cloud-Based Caching Services: Evaluate the use of cloud-based caching services, such as Amazon ElastiCache or Redis Cloud, for managed caching solutions that offer scalability, resilience, and reduced maintenance overhead. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

• AWS Beginner's Key Terminologies

  Amazon ElastiCache (database) Amazon ElastiCache is a web service that simplifies deploying, operating and scaling an in-memory cache in the cloud. The service improves the performance of web applications by providing information retrieval from fast, managed, in-memory caches, instead of relying entirely on slower disk-based databases. Https://aws.amazon.com/elasticache/. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• Amazon DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) vs ElastiCache : Which One to Use?

  Amazon DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) and ElastiCache both are fully managed caching services from AWS. DAX is designed especially for DynamoDB on the other hand ElastiCache can cache anything including DynamoDB. Source: over 1 year ago

• Serverless API Essentials - Idempotency

  Not to sound like a purist, but when I build serverless applications, I'd prefer for all of it to be serverless. Using Amazon Elasticache breaks that paradigm. That service has pay-per-hour pricing and doesn't quite have the flexibility I'm used to when working with serverless services. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Amazon Aurora mentions (20)

• Vector database is not a separate database category

  As far as the big players are concerned, Google offers AlloyDB (https://cloud.google.com/alloydb) while Amazon offers Aurora (https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/). - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• Building realtime experiences with Amazon Aurora

  Aurora is a managed database service from Amazon compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. It allows for the use of existing MySQL code, tools, and applications and can offer increased performance for certain workloads compared to MySQL and PostgreSQL. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

• Interview candidates that don't know the stuff on their CV's - What am I missing?

  See my other comment on this thread. More typically you'd use RDS for external DB. Aurora is a megascale version. Source: 10 months ago

• multi write in the same time

  If you get to a point where RDS cannot handle your work load you can migrate to Amazon Aurora: Https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/. Source: about 1 year ago

• "Everything in games has a budget. When we use the term 'budget', as developers, we're not talking about money. You know, a lot a lot of people hear that thing, they think, 'Oh, that's how much money you spend...'"

  Just like how DB replication and load-balancers exists for ~20 years, SC is making far worse version of them under different name. So this "budget" thingy is just another distraction for cult to discuss, so the followers can claim "they know game development". Source: about 1 year ago