Amara VS Launchpad.net

A quick Google search found me https://amara.org/ so maybe content creators could us it to allow others to add su s. Source: about 1 year ago

Man, just happened the same to me. I was transcribing some clases using the large model and theres a point in the video that the teacher gets a 5 minute break, and what happens? I get the following (https://imgur.com/a/8HQdpng). It is in spanish but says, brought by amara.org, which is a web that subtitltles things and then a lot of ads. Source: about 1 year ago

Https://amara.org/ ? You just link your video, and volunteers can/will translate it to whatever language you want. Source: about 1 year ago

You could use amara.org for a free and opensource web-based translation tool. Source: about 1 year ago

The best thing is Amara, and is in fact what Google shunted in place when they removed community captioning, giving creators a whole 3 months (or something similarly piddly) of one of their paid services for free. It's not an equivalent experience though, as folks have to go elsewhere AND know a volunteer-captioned video exists in the first place. Separate but equal is not equal. Source: over 1 year ago

I agree, but I think that model of GPG is not how it's used any more. I think nowadays people upload a one-shot CI key, which is used to sign builds. So you're basically saying "The usual machine built this". Which is good information, don't get me wrong, but it's much less secure than "John was logged into his laptop and entered the password for the key that signed this" So, you're right, that GPG verifies... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

You can use https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/, but that's no official Mozilla repository. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

As a user of the PPA packages (https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa), now I'm confused. Are these the same packages? Should I switch? I'd have appreciated at least a mention in the article. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

There's also a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa Though you'll have to convince Ubuntu to prefer that instead of the snap. It's not hard, certainly easier than installing Debian which is probably still what I should have done. I think I used this guide: https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt-ubuntu-22-04 Though what that doesn't tell you is that the snap... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

Https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa A quick google will find plenty of sites telling you how to adjust the package versioning priorities to keep the MozillaTeam version of FF preferred over the crappy snap one. I still use Ubuntu desktop as my daily driver and server OS, and we have zero snaps installed on any of our systems. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago