Unlike other frameworks, you can’t just npm install and write code. Take one look at the Tailwind CSS installation page and before you even begin, you need to decide if you want to install it with the CLI or as a PostCSS plugin. Wait, you know CSS, but what is PostCSS? Then, you keep reading and you see something about CSS preprocessor and you might wonder what that is too. Then, you see that you not only have to... - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
Mixins - This allows you to reuse a set of rules inside another rule. I never really found a good use case for mixins. They were available to me when I was still using Bootstrap with LESS, but using them seemed a little complex, because you always need to look up what they do and the resulting CSS output is not always clear. If you're thinking of using them for browser prefixes (e.g. -webkit-transform), I would... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Simple, fast, and a little bit opinionated, Eleventy Plus Vite features Eleventy 2.0.0-canary, the new Eleventy 2.0 Dev Server with live reload, Vite 3.0 as Middleware in Eleventy Dev Server (using eleventy-plugin-vite), build output post-processing by Vite (with Rollup), CSS/Sass post-processing with PostCSS including Autoprefixer and cssnano, a custom CSS/Sass structure, basic fluid typography based on Utopia,... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
w/ postcss-preset-env(v7.8.3): convert modern CSS into something most browsers can understand, determining the polyfills you need based on your targeted browsers or runtime environments. It takes the support data that comes from MDN and Can I Use and determine from a browserlist whether those transformations are needed. It also packs Autoprefixer within and shares the list with it, so prefixes are only applied... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
As others have said, you need to normalize. Also, you may need something like autoprefixer if you're using styles that have different vendor prefixes. https://github.com/postcss/autoprefixer. Source: over 1 year ago
Mmm maybe it's not gap then, maybe it's some other property. Maybe autoprefixer could help. Or polyfills, as other user suggested. Source: over 1 year ago
Of course, we have great tooling for that: Autoprefixer, PostCSS and Stylelint for CSS transformation, Babel and Webpack for JavaScript transpilation and bundling, ESLint for code analysis, and many others. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Bulma uses autoprefixer to make (most) Flexbox…. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Autoprefixer plugin uses Can I use to search for browser support and accordingly add vendor prefixes to CSS properties. You can install autoprefixer from npm. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
In CSS, there's sometimes different prefixes for each engine, but there are ways to get around that too with autoprefixers. Source: about 2 years ago
The first way, using filter, actually performs better because browsers can use hardware acceleration. However, it's not supported in IE11. So, if your users use IE11, you might want to avoid using filter. Alternatively, some browsers offer compatibility through the use of prefixes like -webkit-animation instead of animation. Many projects these days use a form of Autoprefixer to automatically do this for you. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Alternatively, use a tool like Autoprefixer. CSS-in-JS libraries may also do it for you (for Styled Components, it's a default feature). - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Did you read their README? It explains what it does with examples. Source: over 2 years ago
Ahhh, that makes sense then. Definitely look into autoprefixer if you don’t know it. (Doesn’t replace testing tho...). Source: over 2 years ago
Autoprefixer is probably what you're looking for? Source: over 2 years ago
Autoprefixer is used to parse CSS and add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. It is recommended by Google and used in Twitter and Alibaba. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
One such plugin is Autoprefixer, which handles the addition of browser prefixes to your stylesheets. While browsers largely follow the same CSS standards, there are still variations in the implementation of those standards, particularly if they are experimental. You may have seen code such as the below before:. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Currently CSS versioning is a mess with countless separate modules. CSS authors should embrace feature or module based thinking by using feature queries (@supports) or automatic tools (browserslist, PostCSS, autoprefixer, etc.) to provide fallbacks or vendor prefixes for legacy browsers. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
To install the necessary dependancies for Tailwind CSS ,PostCss 7 and autoprefixer. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
As you don't have that time, autoprefixer is your friend. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
For those who are not using the Tailwind CLI tool (which adds all the vendor prefixes automatically), you can use Autoprefixer. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Autoprefixer to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about Autoprefixer. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.