I would recommend Amazon S3 Glacier https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ . You can explicitly upload files there via web interface or many 3rd party clients. You can also upload to more than one geographical location. - Source: Reddit / 2 months ago
What you want, is Amazon Glacier. You're not talking about Backup here, you're talking about Archival. - Source: Reddit / 2 months ago
AWS S3's Deep Glacier To save even more on long-lived archive storage such as compliance archives and digital media preservation, choose S3 Glacier Deep Archive, the lowest cost storage in the cloud with data retrieval within twelve hours. - Source: Reddit / 2 months ago
The Amazon S3 Glacier storage classes are purpose-built for data archiving and you can choose from three archive storage classes optimized for different access patterns and storage duration. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
If you say you need object storage, then blob is the way to go. It will be easy to setup if you already use Azure. But do setup a backup policy. Also if I were you I would use a second provider to avoid vendor lock in. Also you should look into a cold storage solution with a different provider (not Azure) for secondary backups (e.g. See https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/). - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
You do realise that your fancy cloud uses tape as well right - https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ And btw I am gen x, boomers technically predate tape. The good thing about your generation however is that with your disposable storage and disposable culture no one will remember you. While our VHS records are still alive and working fine same with the film the boomers used to use. - Source: Reddit / 5 months ago
Does anyone use Amazon's long term storage like Glacier? https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. - Source: Reddit / 5 months ago
You could put the stuff you are just archiving in Amazon cold storage. https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ - the deep archive category which is not live access to your data is like 95 cents per terabyte and month, last I checked. That's 360 bucks a year. - Source: Reddit / 7 months ago
There may be a point for some to employ cloud storage like the Amazon S3 Glacier option. - Source: Reddit / 7 months ago
"S3 Glacier" - the storage class for S3 - uses the S3 API, and is the one they seem to want you to use. It's easier to use via Lifecycle Policies or Intelligent Tiering. Objects can be up to 5 TiB. See https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. - Source: Reddit / 9 months ago
AWS Glacier Deep Archive costs about $1/TB/month and is highly redundant, so for cold storage and DR is perfect for this. Shamirs secret sharing is a cool tech for breaking up secret data between people to allow the reconstruction of a secret key. Links: https://keepass.info/ - cross platform password safe https://authy.com/ - Free 2FA with backup service https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ - Info... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Azure and AWS both will easily store this much, you just need to organize it into separate buckets/storage accounts. If you don't need to access them often (read: weeks between accessing, and you know 48 hours ahead of time that you'll need it), the cheapest option is Deep Glacier Storage. - Source: Reddit / 11 months ago
You may be interested in this, https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. - Source: Reddit / 11 months ago
Glacier is just a storage setting for individual files on S3, support was right. Your backups are sent to S3 with a storage class setting. - Source: Reddit / about 1 year ago
If what you want is purely a backup, and you won't be accessing the data unless something needs to be restored, then look into the AWS deep storage options like Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive (https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/). - Source: Reddit / over 1 year ago
Correct. This is the cheapest hot/cool cloud storage I know. Cheaper than that would be Azure Archive or AWS Glacier since they cost $0.00099 per month for 1GB, but it takes a while to retrieve data back. If you need a long-term archival, their solutions are good for the job. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/storage/blobs/ Https://aws.amazon.com/s3/glacier/. - Source: Reddit / over 1 year ago
If this suits your needs, take a look at this. Might be a bit of a hassle to set up for beginners, but alternatives from GCP or Azure (linode, digital ocean) might work too. - Source: Reddit / over 1 year ago
Who knows what the next 500 years will bring in terms of communication. I know some artists have experimented with aircraft grade aluminum and titanium as a medium for long-lived artwork. If I had to do something digital today, it would probably involve prepaying Amazon Glacier https://aws.amazon.com/s3/glacier/ and faster s3 for as long as possible, then whatever long term plans I could muster for continuation-... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Https://aws.amazon.com/s3/glacier/ - the "Glacier Deep Archive" is 95 cents per month and terabyte, so four bucks a month. $48 a year, $480 over ten years. - Source: Reddit / over 1 year ago
Another route to go for offsite storage could be Amazon Glacier, their storage is super cheap but it could be time consuming to get all of the data restored. Glacier is cheap but the downside (the way amazon pitched it to me was) when it comes to recovery, they'll get to it when their demand is low so it could take a couple days to recover the data but at a buck a TB/mo its not bad https://aws.amazon.com/s3/glacier/. - Source: Reddit / over 1 year ago
Yeah, a company that does tech would keep mission critical software like this in a service like itGlacier, but FFG isn't a software company. They probably had only a few devs on staff, total, and that's a great way to write off what they say as "unimportant" and fall prey to this kind of issue. - Source: Reddit / over 1 year ago
Do you know an article comparing Amazon Glacier to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.