Software Alternatives & Reviews

Chrome considers gems to be dangerous?

RubyGems
  1. RubyGems. org is the Ruby community's gem hosting service. Instantly publish your gems and then install them. Use the API find out more about available gems. Become a contributor and improve the site yourself.
    Pricing:
    • Open Source

    #Front End Package Manager #Package Manager #Code Collaboration 94 social mentions

  2. A free, once–weekly e-mail round-up of Ruby news and articles.
    Yes, but it took several hours and a lot of people reaching out to their contacts at Google for a human at Google to get involved and reverse the block. We still don't know how or why metasploit-payloads got falsely reported; was it malicious/intentional or an automated code scanning system at Google? Also, since Google Safe Browsing List is used by many other services to filter out "bad websites", it caused a lot of disruptions. So far we know it auto-removed my Reddit commit, another user's five year old blog post, filtered Peter Cooper's Ruby Weekly newsletter, all because they contained links to rubygems.org. Also, according to Twitter it broke a couple of people's CI builds since they had their DNS servers hooked up to the Google Safe Browsing List.

    #Ruby Newsletter #Newsletters #Developer Tools 18 social mentions

Discuss: Chrome considers gems to be dangerous?

Log in or Post with