Trag
Codeium
CodeRabbit
Golfler
Super Stickman Golf 3
Paletro
Review Board
GolfPass
Reviewable
Gerrit Code Review
Phabricator
Review Board
SonarQube
Atlassian Crucible
BitBucket
GitHub
Trag is an AI code review tool which helps to make code review process faster and save senior engineers time by giving them already ai pre-reviewed code.
Trag ReviewableTrag's answer
Static code analysis and LLMs
Trag's answer
Software engineers.
Trag's answer
Trag ancestor was design system analytics tool which allowed companies to solve small part of their technical debt. Trag is going to become a "software maintenance on autopilot" tool.
Trag's answer
Trag helps to pre-review code and find bugs before sending it to code review.
Trag's answer
Trag enable users to customize their code review process based on company culture.
Based on our record, Reviewable seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
>See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
Codeium - Free AI-powered code completion for *everyone*, *everywhere*
Gerrit Code Review - OpenSource Git Code Review Tool
CodeRabbit - Unleash AI on Your Code Reviews with CodeRabbit
Phabricator - Phacility - Phabricator
Golfler - On-course, on-demand
Review Board - Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes